|
      
|


Home
Expert Exchange
Program Library Truman Resources British Marshall Resources Rhodes Resources Fulbright Resources Soros Resources
WH Fellows Resources
About Us
FAQs
|
Advice and Guidelines
(compiled with the input and advice of Janet
Eissenstat, Director of the President’s Commission on
White House Fellows)
 |
Be consistent: The
application should be a consistent whole. If there are apparent
contradictions, explain them. |
 |
Be clear and explicit:
This holds true particularly with regard to your goals and
aspirations. After reading your application, a reviewer
should have no difficulty telling what your basic values
are, what motivates you, and what you think about the issues
you address. |
 |
Make sure you “summarize”
clearly and favorably: Reviewers read many applications
and come to think of applicants in terms of one-sentence
summaries (e.g., the ex Army officer Boston attorney who’s
concerned with women’s health). Think of how you would
summarize yourself, and write your application with that
in mind. |
 |
PROOFREAD AND SPELL CHECK:
Such trivial errors won’t get you automatically disqualified,
but they certainly do not endear you to the reviewers. The
same goes for the word limits. |
 |
Reign in your muse: Essays
should be interesting, but don’t try to get too creative.
Stick to the basic essay format. |
 |
Be brief: If you can say
what you need to say clearly and concisely in 150 words,
don’t write another 50 or 150 just to fill up the
word count. |
 |
Questions 11-15 should stand alone:
If someone were to read them out of the context of the rest
of the application, they should still be cogent and comprehensible.
However, the application is considered as a whole, so the
disparate sections must be consistent with one another in
context as well. |
 |
Don’t send unrequested material:
Supplemental information will not be considered, so don’t
bother to send it. |
back to White House
Fellows Resources
|
|
|
|